Kateřina Trčková, Dana Kričfaluši
Ukázka zadání a hodnocení badatelské úlohy
Číslo: 3/2019
Periodikum: Biologie-Chemie-Zeměpis
DOI: 10.14712/25337556.2019.3.3
Klíčová slova: badatelsky orientovaná výuka, formativní hodnocení úloh, sebereflektivní dotazník, metodika hodnocení úloh, Inquiry-Based Science Education, formative evaluation of tasks, self-reflective questionnaire, methodology for the evaluation of tasks
Pro získání musíte mít účet v Citace PRO.
tasks. At first, four levels of research were constructed and verified. Worksheet analysis has revealed that pupils have no
problem with solving (75.6% of the teams are in the highest level of open research), but with the writing of research and
observation findings. Methodology of the assessment of the research tasks included a common part of the scoring: for the
chosen level of research, teamwork, implementation and a completed worksheet corresponding to the level of processing. The
following items were evaluated in the worksheet: Properly compiling a research problem, research questions, work progress,
and describing the results of the solution to the problem. It was found that 43.9% of teams cannot formulate a research problem,
45.2% of teams incorrectly formulate research questions, 43.6% of teams have an unacceptable or missing progression,
90.2% of teams clearly write results and only 9.8% of teams writes the results to the table. By evaluating the self-reflective
questionnaire, it was found that pupils are positively perceived as experimenting with „scientific research“. Assigning tasks
based on solving practical problems from everyday life motivate them, make them think and provide more sustained knowledge.
Analysis of the assessment of worksheet solutions will improve the pupils‘ level of competence and their competitiveness
in international research.